Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Clark

The gravamen of respondent’s position in this case is twofold. He first contends that since DR 1-102(A) refers specifically to conduct committed by lawyers, this court cannot discipline him for acts committed prior to his being admitted to the bar. Second, respondent asserts that the board’s recommendation of permanent disbarment is unduly harsh.

*83DR 1-102(A) provides, in pertinent part:

“A lawyer shall not:

<<* * *

“(3) Engage in illegal conduct involving moral turpitude.

ti * * *

“(6) Engage in any conduct that adversely reflects on his fitness to practice law.”

Respondent emphasizes that he…