Legal Opinion

9878866 Canada Inc. v. Intake Breathing Technology, LLC

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided April 27, 2026No. Civil Action No. 2025-2443Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ____________________________________ ) 9878866 CANADA INC., ) ) Plaintiff, ) Counter-Defendant, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 25-2443 (RBW) ) INTAKE BREATHING ) TECHNOLOGY, LLC, ) ) Defendant, ) Counter-Plaintiff. ) ) MEMORANDUM OPINION The parties in this case both sell competing disposable nasal adhesive products designed to be used with a magnetic nasal strip to help users of the nasal device breathe better. The plaintiff/counter-defendant, 9878866 Canada Inc. (hereinafter referred to as the “plaintiff” or “Pl.”), does not hold a patent…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
  2. Insurance Corp. of Ireland v. Compagnie Des Bauxites De GuineeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
  4. Christianson v. Colt Industries Operating Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. Vitronics Corporation v. Conceptronic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API