Legal Opinion
Morley Bros. v. F. R. Patterson Construction Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided March 6, 1934No. Docket No. 48, Calendar No. 37,528PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtEdward M. Sharpe, J.
In July, 1927, the defendant F. R. Patterson Construction Company entered into a'contract with the city of Saginaw for the construction of a pumping and purification station with the defendant National Surety Company as surety under the statute (3 Comp. Laws 1929, § 13132) requiring a bond for the payment of all labor and materials used in the fulfilment of such contract and for the payment of all subcontractors, etc.
Plaintiff is a subcontractor and entered into an agreement to supply certain hardware to be installed in the waterworks building. The bid of plaintiff was based on a list of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Strom-Johnson Construction Co. v. Riverview Furniture StoreMichigan Supreme Court · 1924
- Casey v. McFarlane Bros. Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1910
- Reid v. Bradstreet Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1931
- Banwell v. RisdonMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
- Shultz v. SeibelSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1904
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Cloverdale Equipment Company v. Simon Aerials, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
- Barnes v. BeckMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
- Cook v. Little Caesar Enterprises, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1997
- St. John v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1944
- Kovacs v. Electronic Data Systems Corp.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1990
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.