Legal Opinion

Kruegel v. Williams

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 19, 1916No. 970Published

Appeal from District Court, Dallas County; J. C. Roberts, Judge. Action by Herman Kruegel against W. H. Williams and another. Prom a judgment for defendants, plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtHall, J.

Appellant sued H. H. Williams, as district clerk of Dallas county, together with the sureties on his official bond, for actual and exemplary damages, because of the refusal of Williams to issue an execution upon a judgment rendered in favor of appellant against Murphy & Bolanz, March 7, 1894. A review of the record shows that the same issues, based upon the same facts, have heretofore been decided adversely to appellant in the cases cited below, where full statements of all the matters presented in this appeal are set out. Por the reasons announced in the eases cited, the judgment herein is…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Pecos & Northern Texas Railway Co. v. CoffmanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1909
  2. Kruegel v. Murphy & BolanzCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1910
  3. Kruegel v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913
  4. Kruegel v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1912
  5. Kruegel v. MurphyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API