Legal Opinion

Kruegel v. Williams

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 1, 1913PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Dallas County; Kenneth Foree, Judge. Contempt proceedings by Herman Kruegel against H. H. Williams and others to punish defendant for refusal to issue an execution on a money judgment in favor of complainant against Murphy & Bolanz. From a judgment dismissing the proceedings, complainant appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

This is an appeal from a judgment rendered upon a motion filed by Herman Kruegel in the Fourteenth district court of Dallas county, Tex., praying that H. H. Williams, district clerk of said county, be held in contempt for failure to issue an execution on a money judgment rendered by said court in favor of said Kruegel, wherein said Kruegel was plaintiff and Murphy Bolanz were defendants.

The motion alleged, in effect, that the judgment was valid and subsisting; that Kruegel was the owner thereof; that it had never been paid off and canceled; that six executions had been issued thereon; and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Womack v. StokesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1895
  2. Lewis v. HutchisonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1890

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Cadle Co. v. LobingierCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2001
  2. Dunn v. LigonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1968
  3. Kruegel v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916
  4. Marvin Glenn Berry and Bonnie Berry as Successor in Interest to Dennis Wayne Berry v. Albert Theodore Powers and Allied Ports LLC, Texas Court of Appeals, 15th District2025
  5. Maryland Attorney General Opinion 98 OAG 023, Maryland Attorney General Reports2013

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API