Southern Ry. Co. v. Quillen
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
FOSTER, Justice.
This is an action under the homicide statute, Code 1940, Tit. 7, § 123, in which plaintiff obtained a judgment, and the Southern Railway Company prosecutes-this appeal.
The case went to the jury on counts 4 and 6, and the appellant, to which we will refer as the defendant, insists that both of those counts are subject to the demurrer interposed.
That question involves-the real heart of the controversy, and, therefore, it is necessary, in order that those counts may be properly analyzed, to state the nature of the case as made by the evidence. It is-that in the city of Sheffield…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Montgomery St. Ry. Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1905
- City of Bloomington v. Illinois Central RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1895
- Claude Jones & Son v. LairSupreme Court of Alabama · 1944
- McIntosh v. SchroederIllinois Supreme Court · 1895
- Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. ReddingSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1916
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Tittle v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1949
- Alabama Great Southern R. Co. v. BishopSupreme Court of Alabama · 1953
- Franklin v. City of AthensCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2005
- Louisville N. R. Co. v. SimmonsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948