Legal Opinion

Cameron v. Purbaugh

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 29, 1924No. 18518PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMackintosh, J.

Appellants being tbe owners of a farm, entered into a contract whereby they agreed to sell it to the respondents who were to make certain annual installment payments on tbe principal, to pay tbe taxes and assessments levied against it, time being of tbe essence of the contract. Tbe respondents entered into possession and did not make tbe payments of principal as they came due, tbe appellants not insisting upon a strict performance; nor were tbe interest, taxes and assessments paid according to tbe terms of tbe contract. Tbe respondents were in possession over two years and eight months, when…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Douglas v. HanburyWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Walker v. McMurchieWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Whiting v. DoughtonWashington Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Swash v. SharpsteinWashington Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Gerard-Fillio Co. v. McNairWashington Supreme Court · 1912

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. J & J Electric, Inc. v. Gilbert H. Moen Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1973
  2. Granston v. BoileauWashington Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Pitman v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API