Legal Opinion
Vibra Brush Corp. v. Schaffer
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided April 3, 1957PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WEINFELD, District Judge.
The plaintiff seeks a preliminary injunction to enjoin the Postmaster from enforcing a fraud order under which all mail, registered and unregistered, is returned to the sender marked “Fraudulent” and postal money orders payable to plaintiff are returned to the remitter.
The case centers about an electrically operated mechanical brush called Vibra Brush which plaintiff advertised extensively, and which was sold through the mails. The brush was advertised as a new invention which “Shows You How You May Save Your Hair and Grow Hair Again”. The Post Office Department filed…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- American School of Magnetic Healing v. McAnnultySupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- AMERICAN SCHOOL OF MAGNETIC HEALING v. McANNULTYSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Public Clearing House v. CoyneSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Bates & Guild Co. v. PayneSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Donaldson v. Read Magazine, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- People v. MulliganSupreme Court of Colorado · 1977
- Frank Borowicz v. Chicago Mastic Company, Frank Borowicz v. Chicago Adhesive Products CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1966
- Borg-Johnson Electronics, Inc. v. ChristenberryDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1959
- N. Van Dyne Advertising Agency, Inc. v. United States Postal ServiceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1974
- Unique Ideas, Inc. v. United States Postal ServiceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1976
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.