Legal Opinion

State v. Matuska

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 18, 1985No. Cr. 1114PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ERICKSTAD, Chief Justice.

The defendant, Mark Thomas Matuska, appeals from the judgment of conviction of burglary. We affirm.

Matuska was initially charged with seven counts in a complaint filed January 29, 1985. Counts one and four were burglary in violation of Section 12.1-22-02, N.D.C.C. The remainder of the counts were theft of property (possession of stolen property) in violation of Section 12.1-23-02, N.D.C.C. At the conclusion of a trial without a jury, Matuska was found guilty of counts one, two, three, and six. It is only the conviction of count one, the burglary conviction, which…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. AllenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1975
  2. State v. OlsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1980
  3. State v. CarrollNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1963
  4. State v. OhnstadNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
  5. State v. McMorrowNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State v. DymowskiNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
  2. State v. JacobsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
  3. State v. BastienNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
  4. State v. SamaniegoNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2022
  5. State v. MohammedNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API