Legal Opinion

Clarke v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided July 14, 1965No. 22950PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Quillian, Justice.

The verdict was supported by sufficient competent evidence. The record discloses no merit in the general grounds of the motion for new trial.

Ground 4 of the amended motion for new trial complains that, over timely objection of movant’s counsel, the trial judge admitted the following testimony of a State’s witness: “I had just walked in the office and was on the telephone at the time. Mr. Howell came in the door, my office door from outside and he told me . . . ‘There are some suspicious looking Negroes around here at the station,’ and I was listening to him, I put my hand on…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Warrick v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
  2. Woolfolk v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1889
  3. Gully v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
  4. McCray v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910
  5. Massey v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1965

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Short v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
  2. Hart v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1971
  3. State v. LarocqueSupreme Court of Georgia · 1997
  4. Wright v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1984
  5. Evans v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API