Legal Opinion
Ragin v. Harry Macklowe Real Estate Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided June 22, 1989No. 88 Civ. 5665 (RWS)PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
Defendants Harry Macklowe Real Estate Co., Inc. (“Macklowe Real Estate”), Harry Macklowe (“Macklowe”) and Elfon Realty Co. (“Elfon”) have moved pursuant to Fed. R.Civ.P. 15(a) for leave to amend their answer to add additional defenses. For the reasons below, the motion is granted as to the Sixth through Tenth Affirmative Defenses and the Twelfth through Eighteenth Affirmative defenses, and denied as to the Eleventh Affirmative Defense.
Prior Proceedings
On August 12, 1988, plaintiffs in this action filed a complaint challenging the advertising practices of…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Village of Bellwood v. Chandra DwivediCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
- National Westminster Bank, U.S.A. v. RossDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1991
- Ragin v. Harry MacKlowe Real Estate Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1994
- Williams v. Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A.District Court, S.D. New York · 1990
- Mroz v. City of TonawandaDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1998
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.