Legal Opinion

Wells Co. v. Lane

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided February 1, 1927No. 6 Div. 94PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment in favor of appellee against appellant in a suit by him seeking damages on account of an alleged wrongful suing out of a writ of garnishment directed to his employers. The demurrers to the complaint were properly overruled. McCarty v. Williams, 212 Ala. 232, 102 So. 133.

Since, where a number of rulings of the trial court are combined and argued in brief of appellant together, as a single assignment of error, the appellate court will not reverse, if any one of said rulings is free from error (Malone v. Reynolds,213 Ala. 681, 105 So. 891), it will suffice to dispose of appellant's…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. McCarty v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
  2. Malone v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
  3. Pounds v. HamnerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1876
  4. Dishman v. GriffisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. First Shelby Nat. Bank v. MitchellCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1981
  2. Wilkerson v. RandallMississippi Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Askin & Marine Co. v. LoganAlabama Court of Appeals · 1930
  4. Friendly Finance Company of Biloxi, Inc. v. MallettMississippi Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Schwabacher v. HerringAlabama Court of Appeals · 1950

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API