Legal Opinion
Stevens v. Headley
New Jersey Court of Chancery
Decided June 24, 1905PublishedCited by 5 opinions
On final bearing on bill, answer and cross-bill and answer.
1Opinion of the Court
Pitney, Y. C.
(called on for his reasons for purposes of appeal October, 1905).
The complainant, Erederic W. Stevens, by his (amended) bill seeks to enforce the specific performance of a contract in writing for the conveyance of land entered into by him with the defendants William T. Headley and Helen T. Headlejr, dated April 6th, and executed by the Headleys April 7th, 1903.
He makes the defendant William y. Y. Lidgerwood a party defendant, because as owner of other land he claims an easement over the lands covered by the contract, and complainant prays that that claim of easement may be dealt…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Bissell v. . the New York Central R.R. CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1861
- Holdane v. . Trustees of the Village of Cold SpringNew York Court of Appeals · 1860
- Fox v. Union Sugar RefineryMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1872
- Pearson v. AllenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1890
- Regan v. Boston Gas Light Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1884
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Florida Power Corporation v. McNeelyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1960
- Hine v. BlumenthalSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- Velasco v. Goldman Builders, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1966
- Ben-Hor Corp. v. Conant Realty Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1930
- Rubin v. Traurig, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Montgomery County1971