Legal Opinion
DAVID M. VAN LEEUWEN v. ERIC BLODNIKAR
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided August 11, 2016No. 15-CV-448, 15-CV-486, 15-CV-630 & 15-CV-710PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McLEESE, Associate Judge:
After a bench trial, the trial court ruled that appellees/cross-appellants Eric and Terra Blodnikar have an enforceable contract to purchase a building owned by appellee Sam H. Paylor. Appellants/cross-appellees David M. and Meghan R. van Leeuwen challenge that ruling, arguing that they rather than the Blodnikars have an enforceable contract to purchase the building. In their cross-appeal, the Blod-nikars argue that the trial court erroneously failed to award them attorney’s fees against Mr. Paylor. We affirm in part, vacate in part, and remand the case for further…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- 1836 S STREET TEN. ASS'N, INC. v. Estate of B. BattleDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
- District of Columbia Housing Authority v. District of Columbia Office of Human RightsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
- Willie M. Folks v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2014
- Christopher S. Howell and Eastern Market Metro Community Association v. District of Columbia Zoning Commission and Stanton-EastBanc, LLCDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2014
- Brown v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
3Cited by6 opinions
- Darnell Mason v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2017
- Jessica Velcoff, Ph.D. v. MedStar HealthDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2018
- George Papageorge v. Boyle StuckeyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2018
- 1305 Rhode Island Ave, NW v. John D. MussellsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2023
- Saudi American Public Relations Affairs Committee v. Institute for Gulf AffairsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2020
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.