Sosebee v. State

Shulman, Judge.

Defendant appeals his conviction of the offense of burglary. We affirm.

Appellant’s sole enumeration of error is on the general grounds. Specifically, appellant submits that his conviction was impermissibly premised solely upon the uncorroborated testimony of an accomplice. We disagree.

At trial the state presented evidence to show that the witness Jasper Johnson (who defendant claims was an accomplice) was not an accomplice to the crime of burglary, but rather an unwilling “dupe” of the defendant; that Johnson was unaware of defendant’s unlawful activities; and that he had no…