Legal Opinion

Solomon v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 31, 1916No. 7705PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Indictment for larceny; from Washington superior court — Judge Kent. June 13, 1916.

1Opinion of the CourtBroyles, J.

1. The evidence authorized the jury to find that the principal witness for the prosecution was not an accomplice of the defendant. Therefore, in order legally to convict the accused, corroboration of the testimony of this witness was not necessary.

2. Under the facts of the case there is no merit in any of the grounds of the amendment to the motion for a new trial.

3. The evidence'authorized the verdict, and the court did not err in refusing to grant a new trial. Judgment affirmed.

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Knighton v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1929
  2. Gay v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
  3. Nobles v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
  4. Sosebee v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980