Legal Opinion

Northern Indiana Commuter Transportation District v. Chicago SouthShore & South Bend Railroad

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided August 20, 2003No. 46A03-0301-CV-33Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KIRSCH, Judge.

In Bopp v. Brames, 677 N.E.2d 629 (Ind.Ct.App.1997), we noted that the purpose of arbitration is to afford parties the opportunity to reach a final disposition of differences in an easier, more expeditious manner than by litigation. Unfortunately, *1134as this case demonstrates, arbitration is not always easier or more expeditious. Northern Indiana Commuter Transportation District ("NICTD") appeals from the trial court's decision in its case against Chicago South Shore and South Bend Railroad ("South Shore") that referred this matter back to the original panel of arbitrators…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Evansville-Vanderburgh School Corp. v. Evansville Teachers Ass'nIndiana Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. Bopp v. BramesIndiana Court of Appeals · 1997
  3. Angell Enterprises, Inc. v. Abram & Hawkins Excavating Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1995
  4. Northern Indiana Commuter Transportation District v. Chicago Southshore & South Bend RailroadIndiana Court of Appeals · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API