State v. Howell
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtBean Chfield, J.
Upon trial by jury the defendant was found guilty of armed robbery. He contends that the trial court erred in admitting into evidence (1) testimony by a police officer concerning currency found in the defendant’s pocket at the time of the defendant’s arrest, and (2) testimony by a police officer that the defendant had admitted to being a narcotics addict.
A robber held up a drugstore at gunpoint at approximately 8:00 p.m. on February 14, 1969. The robber asked the clerk for money and narcotics. When the clerk told the robber that there were no narcotics in the store, the robber took $75 to…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- State v. GuerreroOregon Supreme Court · 1966
- State v. SuttonOregon Supreme Court · 1968
3Cited by5 opinions
- Eubanks v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1973
- Gould v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1978
- Commonwealth v. WilliamsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- State v. PruittCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
- Gould v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1978