Legal Opinion

State v. Sutton

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 10, 1968PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PEB CUBIAM.

Defendant was convicted of armed robbery. An estimated $50 to $60 had been taken from a gasoline station.

At the time of his arrest, defendant had in his possession $40.50. This fact was admitted in evidence over objection. The only issue is whether admittance of the above evidence was error. Defendant .argues it was, on the ground that possession of the money by itself does not lead to an inference he was the thief. The state argues such evidence is admissible as one circumstance, among others, that can lead to an inference of guilt.

In State v. Hunter, 235 Or 308, 384 P2d 983…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. SackOregon Supreme Court · 1957
  2. State v. HunterOregon Supreme Court · 1963

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. HowellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1970
  2. State v. KefferCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API