Legal Opinion

Depoyster Lumber Co. v. Commercial Lumber Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 11, 1925No. 8 Div. 786PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSomerville, J.

Under our statute of set-off and recoupment (section 10172, Code 1923), it has always been held that a debt due to one of several defendants, sued jointly, may be set off against the plaintiff’s demand. Huddleston v. Askey, 56 Ala. 218; Riley v. Stallworth, 56 Ala. 481; Bank v. Poelnitz, 61 Ala. 147; Craft v. Craft, 209 Ala. 226, 95 So. 901. That construction of the statute, which has been repeatedly re-enacted without change, must now bo adhered to. Moreover, it has been expressly recognized by the provisions of section 5860, Code 1907 (section 10174, Code 1923).

In the instant case, however,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Riley v. StallworthSupreme Court of Alabama · 1876
  2. Huddleston v. AskeySupreme Court of Alabama · 1876
  3. President, Bank of Mobile v. PoelnitzSupreme Court of Alabama · 1878
  4. Craft v. CraftSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Gilliland v. Order of Ry. Conductors of AmericaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
  2. Farish v. HawkSupreme Court of Alabama · 1941
  3. Edwards Specialties, Inc. v. Olive Properties, Inc. (In re Edwards)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Alabama · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API