Legal Opinion
Findlay v. Florida East Coast Ry. Co.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided January 24, 1934No. 7029PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HUTCHESON, Circuit Judge.
Appellant, a holder of some of the first and refunding mortgage bonds of the Florida East Coast Railway, unwilling to intervene in the consolidated causes already pending in the same court in which, at the suit of the creditors and at that of the mortgage trustees, the railway company was being administered by receivers, brought this suit as he claims, as ancillary and dependent to it. The purpose of the suit was to eompel the trustees of the residuary trust estate created by Mrs. Lily Flagler Bingham in her will, of which the railway through the trust’s ownership of…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- General Investment Co. v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Camp v. GressSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Burnrite Coal Briquette Co. v. RiggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Amory v. AmorySupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Munter v. Weil Corset Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Dan Cohen Realty Co. v. National Savings & Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1942
- A. Alex Shuford, Jr. v. Roy G. Anderson, and Currier & Carlsen, Incorporated, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1965
- Dan Cohen Realty Co. v. National Savings & Trust Co.District Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1941
- Midstate Amusement Corporation v. RiversDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 1944
- Fort Wayne Corrugated Paper Co. v. Anchor Hocking Glass Corp.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1940
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.