Legal Opinion
State v. Lamm
Utah Supreme Court
Decided January 16, 1980No. 15888Published
1Opinion of the Court
606 P.2d 229 (1980)
STATE of Utah, Plaintiff and Respondent,
v.
Albert Banard LAMM and Roy Lee Lamm, Defendants and Appellant.
No. 15888.
Supreme Court of Utah.
January 16, 1980.
Royal K. Hunt, Salt Lake City, for defendants and appellant.
Robert B. Hansen, Atty. Gen., Earl F. Dorius, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salt Lake City, for plaintiff and respondent.
HALL, Justice:
Defendant appeals from a conviction of Theft by Receiving,[1] by challenging the sufficiency of the evidence.
The state presented testimony to establish the following facts. On Monday morning, September 20, 1976, it was discovered that a large…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Holland v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- State v. MoynahanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
- State v. GosbyWashington Supreme Court · 1975
- United States v. John Gordon McGlamoryCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
- State v. LammUtah Supreme Court · 1980
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.