Fulmer v. Board of Railroad Commissioners
Montana Supreme Court
1Dissent
Mr. Justice Angstman:
I dissent. Heretofore this court has held that Chapter 184, Laws 1931, is valid as against certain constitutional objections. (Barney v. Board of Railroad Commissioners, 93 Mont. 115, 17 Pac. (2d) 82, 88.) The majority opinion in that case sustained the Act, saying: “In our opinion the Act constitutes a proper exercise of the police power of the state in the regulation of the use of the public highways by contract carriers, and is not to be condemned under the provisions of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States, or like provisions embodied in…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State ex rel. Holliday v. O'LearyMontana Supreme Court · 1911
- Chicago Motor Bus Co. v. Chicago Stage Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1919
- McLain v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1924
- State v. Anaconda Copper Mining Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1900
- Rapid Railway Co. v. Michigan Public Utilities CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.