Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Connolly

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 14, 1997No. 1480PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OLSZEWSKI, Judge:

Perhaps no case more aptly demonstrates the accuracy of the truism that crime doesn’t pay than the present one. Indeed, for Fred Edward Connolly, crime actually cost $20.00 and four-to-eight years imprisonment.

While working the night shift at a convenience store, Nancy Rogers was approached by Fred Edward Connolly, appellant herein. At first blush, the transaction appeared mundane. Appellant placed some groceries on the counter and handed Ms. Rogers a twenty-dollar bill. As Ms. Rogers opened the cash drawer to make change, however, appellant reached across the counter and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. JonesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  2. Commonwealth v. LeeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  3. Commonwealth v. GraySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  4. Commonwealth v. Choi Chun LamSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  5. Commonwealth v. KellumSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. SchultzSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  2. Com. v. Brown, K.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  3. Com. v. Williams, D.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  4. Sprague, R. v. Porter, J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API