Legal Opinion
New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. McManigal
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided January 11, 1937No. 176PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
87 F.2d 332 (1937)
NEW AMSTERDAM CASUALTY CO. et al.
v.
McMANIGAL, Deputy Com'r.
No. 176.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
January 11, 1937.
Ralph L. Emmons, U. S. Atty., of Syracuse, N. Y. (Roger O. Baldwin, Asst. U. S. Atty., of Syracuse, N. Y., of counsel), for appellant.
William Butler, of New York City, for appellees.
Before L. HAND, SWAN, and AUGUSTUS N. HAND, Circuit Judges.
SWAN, Circuit Judge.
The question presented by this appeal is whether the Longshoremen's and Harbor Workers' Compensation Act (33 U.S. C.A. §§ 901-950) covers the case of a workman who was injured while engaged in…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Crowell v. BensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Southern Pacific Company v. JensenSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Grant Smith-Porter Ship Co. v. RohdeSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Nogueira v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Millers' Indemnity Underwriters v. BraudSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Davis v. Department of Labor and Industries of Wash.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Edgar J. Williams, Jr. v. Avondale Shipyards, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
- De Bardeleben Coal Corp. v. HendersonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1944
- Massman Const. Co. v. BassettDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1940
- Zubik v. Bethlehem Steel Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.