Legal Opinion

United States v. Richard Feldman and Richard Martenson

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided August 10, 1987No. 86-1387, 86-1869 and 86-1870PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CUDAHY, Circuit Judge.

The defendants, Richard Feldman and Richard Martenson, appeal their convictions and sentences for mail fraud, wire fraud and racketeering. The defendants were involved with a company known as First Guaranty Metals (“FGM”); FGM was a Florida corporation established in 1978 that was engaged primarily in the retail sale of leveraged futures contracts in precious metals, including gold, silver and platinum. Feldman was one of FGM’s owners. Martenson’s exact role in the company is unclear; at various points in the record he is described as a partner, trader and consultant.

FGM…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Arizona v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Colten v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Bullington v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. United States v. Mattie Lou ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
  2. Elijah Moore v. Ron Anderson, Superintendent, Indiana State PrisonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
  3. United States v. Martin R. KucikCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
  4. United States v. Harold StoryCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
  5. United States v. Enrique RiveraCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API