Legal Opinion

Jiggetts v. Dowling

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 6, 1999PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Judgment, Supreme *145Court, New York County (Karla Moskowitz, J.), entered September 5, 1997, which, inter alia, declared that the shelter allowance for New York City recipients of Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC) is contrary to law because not reasonably related to the cost of housing in New York City, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

According the trial court’s findings of fact appropriate deference (see, Thoreson v Penthouse Intl., 80 NY2d 490, 495), a fair interpretation of the evidence supports its findings that the shelter allowance schedule for AFDC recipients living in…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Thoreson v. Penthouse International, Ltd.New York Court of Appeals · 1992
  2. Jiggetts v. GrinkerNew York Court of Appeals · 1990

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Jiggetts v. DowlingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  2. Jiggetts v. DowlingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  3. Jiggetts v. DowlingNew York Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Brownley v. DoarNew York Court of Appeals · 2009
  5. Brownley v. DoarNew York Supreme Court · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API