Legal Opinion

Rauscher v. Great Northern Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 16, 1922No. 22,822PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Lees, C.

Action for damages for personal injuries. Plaintiff was injured on November 22, 1919, while employed as a mail clerk on one of defendant’s trains. His run was from St. Paul to Casselton, North Dakota. A rule of the postal department required mail clerks to notify the engineer on a mail train who had failed to sound the whistle for a station at which mail was to be put off, of his failure so to do. Printed forms of notice were supplied to the clerks, and it was their duty to deliver the notice to the engineer at the first stop after such a station had been passed without whistling and…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. O'Brien v. American Bridge Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
  2. Kelly v. TyraSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
  3. Mulcahy v. DieudonneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
  4. Klugherz v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
  5. Hull v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1911

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Van House v. Canadian Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
  2. Leonczak v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste Marie Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API