Legal Opinion
River Bridge Corp. v. American Somax Ventures ex rel. American Home Development Corp.
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided August 19, 2009No. 4D08-2076PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMay, J.
The developers appeal an adverse judgment following a jury verdict in a contractor’s claim for lost profits. Multiple issues are raised. We write to address the damages issues. We affirm in part and reverse in part.
In December 1984, American Somax Ventures [ASV] and River Bridge Realty Corporation [RBC] entered into a Selected Builder’s Agreement [SBA] for development of Phase I of a residential development, consisting of approximately five hundred dwellings on five building Pods. Paragraph 11.1 of the SBA provided for the developer to build certain amenities, including a bike path, lighting,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- G.M. Brod & Company, Inc., a Florida Corporation, Cross-Appellant v. U.S. Home Corporation, a Delaware Corporation, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
- Sostchin v. Doll Enterprises, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
- 4 Corners Insurance, Inc. v. Sun Publications of Florida, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009
3Cited by6 opinions
- In re Standard Jury Instructions—Contract & Business CasesSupreme Court of Florida · 2013
- River Bridge Corp v. American Somax VenturesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
- Devon Medical, Inc. v. Ryvmed Medical, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
- ConSeal International Incorporated v. Neogen CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2020
- Martin County v. Polivka Paving, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.