Gillam v. McDonough
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
The appellant challenges the denial of his petition for writ of mandamus and the trial court’s denial of his motion to remove a lien imposed upon his inmate account for court costs relating to the petition. In accordance with our decisions in Hull v. Moore, 790 So.2d 560 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001), and Singletary v. Jones, 681 So.2d 836 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996), we affirm the denial of the petition. But because the trial court incorrectly concluded that the petition for writ of mandamus did not constitute a collateral criminal proceeding, we reverse the order by which the trial court denied the motion to…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Schmidt v. CrusoeSupreme Court of Florida · 2003
- McDonough v. CoxSupreme Court of Florida · 2006
- Cox v. CrosbyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
- Singletary v. JonesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
- Hull v. MooreDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
3Cited by1 opinion
- McGee v. State, Florida Department of CorrectionsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006