Perry, Matthews, Buskirk Stone Co. v. Smith
Indiana Court of Appeals
Prom Lawrence Circuit Court'; James B. Wilson, Judge. Action by George W. Smith against the Perry, Matthews, Buskirk Stone Company. Prom a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtComstock, J.
1. The complaint alleges that the defendant, a corporation, owns and controls an extensive stone-mill, with many saws, etc., used for sawing limestone into products to be marketed in the different cities of the United States; that, in the sawing of said stone, grit, sand and water are used, which make a great amount of slush; that plaintiff is in the .business of slaughtering animals for market in the city of Bedford; that he has had at various times and at all times many cattle and sheep, ranging from five to thirty head, upon real estate owned by him for general use and described in the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. KemperIndiana Supreme Court · 1899
- Shively v. Cedar Rapids, Iowa Falls & Northwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1888
- Vater v. LewisIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
- Sage v. BrownIndiana Supreme Court · 1870
- Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. KingIndiana Court of Appeals · 1900
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Ohio Oil Co. v. WestfallIndiana Court of Appeals · 1909
- Chadwick v. AlleshouseIndiana Supreme Court · 1968
- Flagg v. RussellIndiana Court of Appeals · 1928