Legal Opinion
Clark v. Sears Roebuck & Co.
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided March 11, 2002No. 47674-2-IPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
41 P.3d 1230 (2002)
Darlene A. CLARK, Appellant,
v.
SEARS ROEBUCK & CO., a New York corporation, Respondent, and
Tony Watkins, Defendant.
No. 47674-2-I.
Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1.
March 11, 2002.
Kelly Susan Reese, M. Katheryn Bradley, Wayne W. Hansen, Seattle, for Respondent.
Melton L. Crawford, MacDonald, Hoague & Bayless, Seattle, for Appellant.
APPELWICK, J.
After Sears Roebuck & Company terminated Darlene Clark's at will employment, she sued for wrongful termination. Because the specific written policy in Sears' managers' handbook upon which Clark purported to rely does not amount…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Thompson v. St. Regis Paper CompanyWashington Supreme Court · 1984
- DePhillips v. Zolt Construction Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1998
- DePhillips v. Zolt Const. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1998
- Bulman v. Safeway, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2001
- Bulman v. Safeway, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2001
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Carlson v. Lake Chelan Community HospitalCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
- Baker v. City of SeatacDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2014
- Carlson v. Lake Chelan Community Hosp.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2003
- Goodman v. Sears Roebuck & Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004