Legal Opinion

Ford Motor Credit Co. v. McDaniel

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 12, 1981No. 1697PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BISSETT, Justice.

To be determined in this appeal is whether certain provisions in a retail installment contract violated the Texas Consumer Credit Code, Tex.Rev.Civ.Stat.Ann. art. 5069-2:-01 et seq., hereinafter called the “Credit Code.”

On April 3, 1976, Tanya McDaniel purchased a new 1976 Dodge Charger from Sharpstown Dodge Sales, financing the purchase by executing an installment contract with the seller. The amount financed was $6,129.75. The finance charge was $1,681.77. The total of payments amounted to $7,811.52, and was payable in forty-eight monthly installments of $162.74…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Ford Motor Credit Co. v. MilhollinSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Shropshire v. Commerce Farm Credit Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Walker v. Temple Trust Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Smart v. Tower Land & Investment Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Shropshire v. Commerce Farm Credit Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1931

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Jim Walter Homes, Inc. v. SchuenemannTexas Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Crossmark, Inc. v. Hazar, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2004
  3. Martinez v. Corpus Christi Area Teachers Credit Union, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1988
  4. Armando Fong Najarro and Compania Financiera Libano, S.A. v. Sasi International, Ltd., and Suzanne FrameCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
  5. Dixon v. BrooksCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1984

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API