Legal Opinion

Bellemead Development Corp. v. Borough of Roseland

New Jersey Tax Court

Decided January 20, 1998PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KAHN, J.T.C.

This matter is before this court on defendant municipality and plaintiff taxpayer’s cross-motions for partial summary judgment. Taxpayer filed a complaint seeking modification of Roseland’s 1996 Chapter 123 ratio in conjunction with local property tax appeals for its ten large office building properties located in the Borough of Roseland.1 All ten Roseland properties are in dispute for the 1996 tax year and were direct appeals to this court.

*159The Borough of Roseland filed a motion for partial summary judgment to dismiss those counts in taxpayer’s complaint seeking modification of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Brill v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
  2. Glen Wall Associates v. Township of WallSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
  3. Murnick v. City of Asbury ParkSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
  4. Weyerhaeuser Co. v. Borough of ClosterNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1983
  5. 1530 Owners Corp. v. Borough of Fort LeeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1994

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. City of Atlantic v. Director, Division of TaxationNew Jersey Tax Court · 2008
  2. Borough of Northvale v. Director of the Division of TaxationNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API