Legal Opinion

Smith v. Shasta Electric Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 30, 1961No. Civ. 9839Published

1Opinion of the CourtVan Dyke, P. J.

This is an appeal by William Cox and Guy Cowart from a judgment rendered against them in an action brought by C. A. Smith to recover damages for the alleged negligent destruction by appellants of Smith’s sawmill. The action was tried before a jury. Appellants concede that there was ample evidence to support the charges of negligence, the lack of contributory negligence on the part of Smith and the freedom from neglect on the part of codefendant California-Pacific Utilities Company. William Cox was doing business as Shasta Electric Company and Guy Cowart was his agent. We will refer to Cox as…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Huffman v. LindquistCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Natural Soda Products Co. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Everts v. MattesonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API