Legal Opinion

Thompson v. Hi Tech Motor Sports, Inc.

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided February 8, 2008No. 2006-523PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtReiber, C.J.

¶ 1. After injuring herself during a test drive on one of defendant’s motorcycles, plaintiff sued defendant for negligence. The trial court granted plaintiff partial summary judgment, concluding that the release plaintiff signed was contrary to public policy and therefore void as a matter of law. On interlocutory appeal, we conclude that the waiver is not void for public policy as a matter of law, but that the exculpatory clause does not release defendant for claims caused by its own negligence, and remand.

¶ 2. The following facts are undisputed for purposes of summary judgment. In May 2003,…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Tunkl v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Jones v. DresselSupreme Court of Colorado · 1981
  3. Boehm v. Cody Country Chamber of CommerceWyoming Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Gallipo v. City of RutlandSupreme Court of Vermont · 2005
  5. Samplid Enterprises, Inc. v. First Vermont BankSupreme Court of Vermont · 1996

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Cyr v. McDERMOTT'S, INC.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2010
  2. Jennifer Weinstein v. Jeanmarie Leonard and Carol Sayour v. Lloyd J. Weinstein and The Weinstein Group, P.C.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2015
  3. Provoncha v. VERMONT MOTOCROSS ASS'N, INC.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2009
  4. Earl Scott v. State of VermontSupreme Court of Vermont · 2021
  5. In re Construction & Operation of a Meteorological TowerSupreme Court of Vermont · 2019

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API