Legal Opinion
The Gloucester
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided January 12, 1923No. 1922PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MORTON, District Judge.
The commissioner has disallowed the claims of the Gorton-Pew Fisheries Company (which I shall refer to as the Fisheries Company), the Gorton-Pew Vessels Company (which I shall refer to as the Vessels Company), and the Fort Wharf *581Company, and the present questions are whether he was right in so doing.
As to the Fort Wharf Company, its claim is not now insisted on, and the commissioner’s action is confirmed.
As to the other two claims, the commissioner found that the supplies and repairs had been furnished as claimed. While he makes no express finding that the prices…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- The Murphy TugsDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1886
- City of CamdenDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 1906
- GydaDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1916
- The CimbriaDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1914
- The PuritanDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1919
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Majestic Co. v. Orpheum Circuit, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1927
- Frontera Fruit Co. v. DowlingCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1937
- The Odysseus IIIDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1948
- Floro Herrera Medina (Master), Sergio Aros v. Marvirazon Compania Naviera, S.A., Doctor Elias J. Tsavaris, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1983
- The President ArthurDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1928
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.