Legal Opinion · Dissent

Mullins v. Thompson

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided October 1, 2001No. S01A0865Published

1DissentFletcher, Chief Justice

1. Other jurisdictions have long recognized that a lawyer’s credibility may be challenged on cross-examination by asking him if he has ever been suspended or disbarred.1 Because a lawyer’s suspension for knowingly making false statements in the representation of clients certainly would tend to discredit the veracity of his testimony at trial,2 I would follow the majority rule and permit the impeachment of a lawyer in this circumstance.

2. Additionally, I would hold that the argument that Threlkeld was a member of the bar for 20 years was improper in light of the trial court’s exclusion of the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Butler v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2001
  2. Mullins v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1999
  3. United States v. RubensteinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
  4. State v. LarocqueSupreme Court of Georgia · 1997
  5. Arnold v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API