Legal Opinion
Beebe v. Cullinane
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided March 30, 1921No. Docket No. 111PublishedCited by 1 opinion
Error to Cass; Des Voignes (L. Burget), J. Assumpsit by Albert E. Beebe against Michael M. Cullinane for breach of a contract for the sale of certain potatoes. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtBird, J.
On July 18, 1917, the parties hereto entered into the following written contract:
*38“This memorandum of contract made and entered into this 18th day of July, 1917, between A. E. Beebe & Sons, of Mendon, Michigan, copartners, parties of the first part, and Michael M. Cullinane, of the city of Dowagiac, Michigan, party of the second part, witnesseth as follows:
“That the said parties of the first part have sold to said party of the second part and said party of the second part has purchased of said parties of the first part, 4,000 bushels of potatoes of this fall’s crop to he delivered, by said,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Chandler v. AllisonMichigan Supreme Court · 1862
- Harrington-Wiard Co. v. Blomstrom Manufacturing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1911
- Tradesman Co. v. Superior Manufacturing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1907
- Sauer v. McClintic-Marshall Construction Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1914
- Talley v. CourterMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Goldsmith v. StiglitzMichigan Supreme Court · 1924