Ayers v. Taylor
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtJenkins, P. J.
1. While, under the Code of 1933, § 81-1303, that “no amendment adding a new and distinct cause of action . . shall be allowed unless expressly provided by law,” and that “a suit on quantum meruit or open account can not by amendment be converted into a suit on an express contract” (Jones v. Schacter, 31 Ga. App. 709 (3), 710, 121 S. E. 691; Kraft v. Rowland, 33 Ga. App. 806, 808, 128 S. E. 812), yet where a petition declares upon a quantum meruit, and an amendment is allowed, subject to the right of demurrer, adding a paragraph declaring *535upon an express contract without striking the quantum…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Hudson v. HudsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1892
- Willingham, Wright & Covington v. GloverCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1922
- Kraft v. Rowland & RowlandCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1925
- Jackson v. BuiceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1909
- Felton v. State Highway BoardCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1933
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Sammons v. NabersSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
- Meads v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1937
- Hollingsworth v. RedwineCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1946
- Stinchcomb v. HoardSupreme Court of Georgia · 1965