Legal Opinion

Filler v. Joseph Schlitz Brewing Co.

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided March 13, 1915No. 4145PublishedCited by 3 opinions

In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Missouri. Action at law by Joseph Filler against the Joseph Schlitz Brewing Company. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

ADAMS, Circuit Judge.

The amended petition in this case charged that the defendant the J oseph Schlitz Brewing Company entered into a pool, confederation, and understanding with a corporation known as. the Missouri Poultry & Game Company and other persons unknown to plaintiff to fix the price of bottled beer, manufactured by defendant, in the city of St. Louis and to control and limit the trade in St. Louis and elsewhere of such beer, in violation of the provisions of sections 10298, 10299, 10300 and 10301 of the Revised Statutes of Missouri of 1909, known as the Anti-Trust Law.

Plaintiff set…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Comings v. Hannibal & Central Missoum RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1871
  2. Atlantic & Pacific Railroad v. FreemanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1875
  3. Kneale v. PriceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1886

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hamilton v. Empire Gas & Fuel Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1924
  2. Harelson v. TylerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1920
  3. Simonsen v. BarthMontana Supreme Court · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API