Legal Opinion
Simonsen v. Barth
Montana Supreme Court
Decided July 3, 1922No. 4,751PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MR. CHIEF COMMISSIONER POMEROY
prepared the opinion for the court.
This appeal is from a judgment for the defendants’ testator, following the sustaining of a demurrer to the amended complaint, the plaintiff having declined to further plead.
It appears from the amended complaint that the plaintiff was the lessee in two sheep-grazing leases for 483,928 acres of lands on the Crow Indian Reservation, for the term of five years from February 1, 1916, executed in behalf of the Crow Tribe of Indians by the superintendent of the Crow Indian *99school and approved by the secretary of the interior. It is…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- American Banana Co. v. United Fruit Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Johnson v. TowsleySupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- Angle v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Walker v. CroninMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871
- Totten v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Phillips v. Montana Education Ass'nMontana Supreme Court · 1980
- Ball Ex Rel. Ball v. BallWyoming Supreme Court · 1954
- Conley v. ConleyMontana Supreme Court · 1932
- Quinlivan v. Brown Oil Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1934
- Holladay v. State of Mont.District Court, D. Montana · 1981
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.