Johnson v. Starbucks Corporation

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 SCOTT JOHNSON, 11 No. 2:18-cv-02472-TLN-KJN Plaintiff, 12 v. 13 ORDER STARBUCKS CORPORATION, a 14 Washington Corporation; and DOES 1-10, 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff Scott Johnson’s (“Plaintiff”) Motion to Stay 19 Case Pending Resolution of Appeal. (ECF No. 19.) Defendant Starbucks Corporation 20 (“Starbucks”) opposed Plaintiff’s motion, and Plaintiff filed a reply. (ECF Nos. 20–21.) For the 21 reasons set forth below, Plaintiff’s Motion to Stay is DENIED. 22 /// 23 /// 24…