Legal Opinion
Yablick v. Protecto Safety Appliance Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided September 13, 1927No. 3565Published
1Opinion of the Court
21 F.2d 885 (1927)
YABLICK
v.
PROTECTO SAFETY APPLIANCE CORPORATION.
No. 3565.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.
September 13, 1927.
Rehearing Denied October 22, 1927.
Dean, Fairbank, Obrieght & Hirsch, of New York City (Clair W. Fairbank, Irving M. Obrieght, and Morris Hirsch, all of New York City, of counsel), for appellant.
Archibald Cox, of New York City, for appellee.
Before BUFFINGTON, WOOLLEY, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
DAVIS, Circuit Judge.
This is an appeal from two decrees of the District Court. The first decree dismissed the bill of complaint on the ground that United States letters…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Eibel Process Co. v. Minnesota & Ontario Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Minerals Separation, Ltd. v. HydeSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Solomons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Standard Parts Co. v. PeckSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Naylor v. Alsop Process Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1909
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.