Legal Opinion

Peeler v. Commissioner of Correction

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided February 14, 2017No. AC37382PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAlvord, J.

The petitioner, Russell Peeler, appeals from the judgment of the habeas court denying his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. 1 On appeal, the petitioner claims that the habeas court erroneously (1) deprived him of his right to self-representation; (2) concluded that his claim that his expeditious criminal trial schedule violated his constitutional rights had been procedurally defaulted; (3) concluded that appellate counsel provided effective assistance; and (4) concluded that the state did not suppress evidence in violation of Brady v. Maryland , 373 U.S. 83 , 87, 83 S.Ct. 1194 , 10…

2Cases cited55 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Kyles v. WhitleySupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  5. Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Turner v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018
  2. Godfrey v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2021
  3. State v. RogersConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018
  4. State v. SimmonsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2019
  5. Holbrook v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2019

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API