Peeler v. Commissioner of Correction
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the CourtAlvord, J.
The petitioner, Russell Peeler, appeals from the judgment of the habeas court denying his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. 1 On appeal, the petitioner claims that the habeas court erroneously (1) deprived him of his right to self-representation; (2) concluded that his claim that his expeditious criminal trial schedule violated his constitutional rights had been procedurally defaulted; (3) concluded that appellate counsel provided effective assistance; and (4) concluded that the state did not suppress evidence in violation of Brady v. Maryland , 373 U.S. 83 , 87, 83 S.Ct. 1194 , 10…
2Cases cited55 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Kyles v. WhitleySupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Turner v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018
- Godfrey v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2021
- State v. RogersConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018
- State v. SimmonsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2019
- Holbrook v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2019
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.