Legal Opinion
Holbrook v. Commissioner of Correction
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided April 2, 2019No. AC41165PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtFlynn, J.
*110 The petitioner, Michael Holbrook, appeals from the judgment of the habeas court denying his amended petition for a writ of habeas corpus. On appeal, the petitioner claims that the court improperly concluded that he failed to prove (1) ineffective assistance of his prior habeas counsel, and (2) that the state suppressed exculpatory evidence at his criminal trial in violation of Brady v. Maryland , 373 U.S. 83 , 87, 83 S.Ct. 1194 , 10 L.Ed.2d 215 (1963). We affirm the judgment of the habeas court.
The following facts and procedural history surrounding the petitioner's conviction were set forth…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- California v. TybergSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- State v. WhelanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- Lozada v. Warden, State PrisonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Holbrook v. Comm'r of Corr.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2019