Legal Opinion

Burbank & Burbank v. Bobbitt

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided February 20, 1914PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from Henry Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Miller

Reversing.

The appellants, Burbank & Burbank, are general agents, in Kentucky, for the Aetna Life Insurance Company ; the appellee, Robek, being, at the times hereinafter mentioned, a solicitor for that company, working under the Burbanks, principally in the counties of Shelby and Henry.

On September 6, 1912, Robek being indebted to Burbank & Burbank in a sum hastily fixed at $600.00, he executed his note to them for that amount, secured by a mortgage upon a “Ford” automobile. The notes and mortgage were executed in Jefferson County on September 6th, and the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Stone v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  2. Brown v. CorbinIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Brittenham v. RobinsonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1897
  4. Day & Congleton Lumber Co. v. Stadler & Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1902
  5. Coppage v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1900

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Cappon v. O'DayWisconsin Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Cable Piano Co. v. LewisCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1922
  3. Hauseman Motor Company v. NapierellaCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928
  4. National Cash Register Co. v. K. W. C., Inc.District Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1977
  5. Riley v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1938

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API