Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Hauseman Motor Company v. Napierella

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided March 6, 1928PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Willis

Reversing.

This record presents for determination three conflicting claims to the priprity of the respective rights of claimants in two motor trucks, or the proceeds thereof. "The Hauseman Motor Company asserts title to a service truck by virtue of a purchase thereof at an execution sale made on June 21,1925, by the sheriff of Jefferson county. Peter Andriott & Sons claim a Paige truck under pro ceedings pursuant to Kentucky Statutes, secs. 2739hl and. 2739P2, being the Act of March, 1918, (chapter 75, Acts of 1918, p. 389), which provides a lien on motor…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Loeb v. ConleyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914
  2. Barrett v. FischSupreme Court of Iowa · 1889
  3. Fry Bros. v. TheoboldCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1924
  4. Cable Piano Co. v. LewisCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1922
  5. Hall v. CottonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Black v. Elkhorn Coal CorporationCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1930
  2. Munz v. National Bond Investment CompanyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932
  3. In Re DraneDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1962
  4. Hart County Deposit Bank v. HatfieldCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1930
  5. General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. Sharp Motor Sales Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1930

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API