Legal Opinion

People v. Reilly

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 9, 1987No. A034203PublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SMITH,

J.—We hold in this case that" the prosecution met its burden, under the Kelly/Frye standard (People v. Kelly (1976) 17 Cal.3d 24 [130 Cal.Rptr. 144, 549 P.2d 1240]; Frye v. United States (D.C.Cir. 1923) 293 F. 1013 [34 A.L.R. 145]), of showing (1) that electrophoretic testing of dried bloodstains has gained general acceptance in the scientific community and (2) that the technique was properly used in this case. We will therefore affirm the conviction of Lawrence Patrick Reilly for the second degree murders of Frank Anthony Ragusa, Jennifer Ann Ragusa and Marianne Jane Ragusa.

Backg…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
  2. California v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. People v. KellyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  4. People v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  5. People v. ShirleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. People v. DoolinCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
  2. United States v. John Ray Bonds (91-3610) Mark Verdi (91-3609) and Steven Wayne Yee (91-3608)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
  3. People v. CooperCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  4. People v. MorrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  5. People v. AshmusCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API