Legal Opinion
In re Rezulin Products Liability Litigation
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided June 21, 2004No. 00 Civ. 2843(LAK)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
KAPLAN, District Judge.
Defendants Warner-Lambert and affiliates move, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 37(b), for sanctions against several hundred plaintiffs on the ground that they willfully have failed to comply with this Court’s discovery orders. *111The motion was brought only after these plaintiffs thwarted defendants’ efforts to conduct discovery concerning their claims by their persistent failure to provide discovery despite orders of this Court and warning letters from defense counsel. The sanctions sought are dismissal on the merits with prejudice and an injunction under the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- National Hockey League v. Metropolitan Hockey Club, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Societe Internationale Pour Participations Industrielles Et Commerciales, S. A. v. RogersSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Semtek International Inc. v. Lockheed Martin Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
- United States v. New York Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Bambu Sales, Inc. v. Ozak Trading Incorporated and Doron GratchCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Anne Ruggiero, Individually and as Representative of the Estate of Albert Ruggiero v. Warner-Lambert Company and Parke Davis, Docket No. 04-6674-CvCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Amerigroup Illinois, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2005
- Nebraska Public Power District v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
- In Re Rezulin Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2004